Arbuthnot Books

A small imprint for fiction and ideas.

Privilege And Precarity

Victoria Road chapter of Event/Horizon

title: Privilege & Precarity date: 2026-02-15 author: lede: Political background to the Victoria Road chapter of “Event/Horizon”. —

Victoria Road

Victoria Road, the first chapter of Eamonn Vincent’s Event/Horizon opens in the register of the comic realist anecdote — a nervous interview, a battered truck, a curt foreman — and then quietly widens until it has sketched an entire social moment: the twilight of an undergraduate year, the squeeze of household finances, the seasonal scattering of friends. What feels at first like a vignette about an inept driving test is in fact a tight study of mobility and immobility — social, economic, emotional — staged in a city that is both site of privilege and a place of practical improvisation. The novel’s technique is notable for the way it attends to material detail in order to register larger political and cultural pressures; its atmosphere is composed from the friction of things — a “crash gearbox,” a tin of Old Holborn, a painted lamp-post reading “Reality Checkpoint” — that together make a period and a social world come alive.

Period texture in this chapter emerges by accretion. The political weather is named plainly in a throwaway line — “oil price rises, the miners’ strike, three-day weeks and so on” — and the list does the double work of dating the scene (the energy shocks and industrial unrest of the 1970s) and converting national economic crisis into private constraint. But the excerpt never turns the politics into sloganising; instead, the era is embodied in habits, rhythms and artifacts. The depot is saturated with class-signalled detail (the foreman “closely studying a copy of The Sun,” a tanker driver “rolling a cigarette from a tin of Old Holborn”), while domestic life is denoted by the LPs on a turntable — Joni Mitchell, Captain Beefheart, Pink Floyd — and by the communal rituals of cooking and smoking. These items do more than decorate: they register taste, aspiration and generational affinities. The music choices map social allegiances and anxieties — Beefheart’s art-school curio registering an artful contrarianism, Dark Side of the Moon supplying a soundtrack for a group on the brink of dispersion — and the careful inventory of album sleeves, pseudonyms and liner notes becomes a form of collective intelligence and banter among friends.

The novel’s social imagination is attentive to the dissonances of Cambridge as a place where elite trajectories and more provisional livelihoods intersect. Steve’s furtive smoothing of his CV — telling Sid he’s at “the Tech” rather than a university undergraduate — is small but revealing: class and institutional signifiers matter in how one is read and whether one is trusted. The living arrangements — a shared house where meals have been “a regular feature of the previous year” — and the housemates’ gentle management of Steve’s mortification (no one voicing the thought that there might be another way to solve his finances) show how intimacy functions as social insurance at the margins of respectability. The campus is both a site of privileged futures (public-school contemporaries, graduate trajectories to Brighton and Edinburgh) and a site where survival economies intrude: milk rounds, sublets, summer jobs. The tension between aspiration and necessity is crystallised in Steve’s declaration, “I’m a writer. I don’t want to be a suit in the city,” an assertion that frames the ethical as well as the practical stakes of his choices.

Formally, the chapter and, by extension, the novel relies on a controlled narrative distance that moves between wry detachment and sympathetic interiority. The narrator’s eye is at its most forensic in the driving scene: the description of a gearbox so recalcitrant that it emits “howls of complaint,” the “calliper-style handbrake,” the sequence of clutch depressions and exploratory waggles of the gear stick. The syntactic rhythm slows into step-by-step choreography; parataxis and short clauses (“He depressed the clutch and searched for reverse. After a brief struggle he found the slot”) generate the bodily tempo of anxiety. This is a useful technical strategy: slowing the sentence to the mechanics of a manoeuvre allows readers to feel Steve’s bodily clumsiness without sentimentalising him. When the gaffer’s verdict arrives — “Fucking awful” — the blunt clause cuts through the interiority and reasserts the public verdict that will shape Steve’s prospects.

That interplay of private feeling and public judgement recurs in smaller, quieter ways. Steve’s negotiations with Angie about where to spend the summer and whose ambitions to privilege are scenes of interior stakes spoken into shared space. Angie’s pragmatism — “I start in three weeks. I don’t want to let them down” — and Steve’s insistence on autonomy (“I’m a writer… I don’t want to be a suit in the city”) exemplify how private relationships are enmeshed in institutional and economic calendars: deposits paid on rooms, starting dates for language schools, and the imperative of actually graduating, if only for his mother’s sake. The novel treats these pressures without melodrama; instead, the domestic dialogue accumulates into a moral economy in which affection is negotiated against projected futures.

There is also an intellectual texture to the piece — an understory of argument and performance. Harry’s quick Marxist riposte about Beefheart as “another capitalist exploiter” and the ensuing mocking exchanges show the house acting as a micro-public sphere where political positions are tried on and discarded, often half in earnest, half as social play. Jez’s dry encyclopedic knowledge of band members’ real names and the group’s teasing response (“There speaks someone already in PhD mode”) stage a culture of inverted credentials: erudition and countercultural capital circulate alongside academic ambition and future professional roles. Even the silly debates about prosody — “Spondee not trochee” — enact an undergraduate sensibility that delights in esoteric refinements. These moments are comic and affectionate, but they also underline how cultural and intellectual capital operate as resources in a world where economic capital is scarce.

Motif and image further sustain the thematic architecture. Vehicles — bike, milk float, flatbed truck, punt to Grantchester — operate as metaphors of station and trajectory. Steve arrives on a bicycle, stumbles into the workaday world of the depot, is thrust into a truck he cannot master, and imagines Brighton and Edinburgh as potential destinations. Mobility is both desired and constrained; the truck’s recalcitrant gearbox is an emblem for the clumsiness of social mobility in a brittle economy. Similarly, food and music function as modes of social repair: Harry’s delicious bolognese, the passing of joints, the communal listening to records are rituals that postpone the inevitable scattering (“an era was coming to an end”), turning shared taste into a temporary bulwark.

The excerpt’s aesthetic stakes are thus quietly political. By committing to small things — the precise mechanics of a three-point turn, the name on a cigarette tin, the affiliative quality of album sleeves — the narrator refuses sweeping aphorisms in favour of material particularity. This is an ethical posture as much as an artistic one: the politics of the period (industrial unrest, austerity, the collapse of certain working-class industries) is registered through domestic economies and everyday gestures, producing a social realism that is humane rather than didactic.

What is distinctive and effective here is the way comedy and sympathy are held in balance. The gaffer’s comic cruelty (“Fucking awful”) is immediate and undiluted; yet the narrator invites us to attend to Steve’s shame and resourcefulness as much as to his incompetence. The house scenes are no less comic for being tender: the friends’ ribbing, the song about Angie, the shared LPs are all forms of social pedagogy that preserve care without sentimentality. Critically, the prose makes such scenes feel like evidence that in a time of economic contraction, culture and camaraderie still redistribute value.

Taken together, the chapter shows a novelist interested in the everyday infrastructures that sustain or threaten a privileged mode life. In the cramped cabin of a dairy depot, in a living-room singalong, we find the social forces that will shape a generation’s mobility and immobility. The technique — close, patient, lightly amused — maps a moral geography in which private desires and public conditions are inseparable. The result is a small but capacious portrait of an era: an economy of vanishing certainties, a culture of vinyl and joints, and the intimate struggles of those who must learn to make their way through a world whose machinery sometimes refuses to cooperate.